On the topic of folios, I think it is a great idea and I think it is gaining popularity. I have to say though that I find the artist name and other lettering on each image rather off putting. In a way I am surprised of your design choice, given your usual ethos of the humbleness and modesty of the artist. It reminds me of cheapo Ikea or office "motivation" photo posters or even banner advertising. In a way it is advertising for the artist really, which for me introduces a branding or commercial aspect and takes away from the image itself. I believe that the artist name and info belongs on the back. If one were to frame the prints, surely the text would/should be cropped out.
— Dirk
Thanks for the feedback. I understand your comments, but there are several reasons we include text on the folio images:
- Should an image ever be separated from the folio for any reason, it would lose its identity and origin.
- We think of folios as something between a book and original artwork; text in this context seems okay.
- With so many photographers producing their original artwork using the same technology (pigment prints) that we use, we feel it is important to distinguish our prints as being something different from their originals. Since these are not signed by the photographers, this text seems an acceptable way for them to be identified.
- The common text on each image ties the various images in the folio together as a whole.
As you say, should someone choose to mat the prints for framing, they can choose to include or exclude the text components — and we do the layouts that way on purpose.
As to text on the back, this is possible and we do hand-write titles on the back of the Chiarenza folio, for example, but generally prefer the text on the front as part of the design. Besides, typeset text is more readable than my lousy handwriting! Besides, if the text were on the back, matting with the text visible is no longer an option.
I do appreciate your thoughts about this. I fact, in some of my personal work, I do folio images (originals, in this case) without the text, so you can see I do agree with you in some cases.